ONLINE

Stoplosingviewersinthe
first10seconds.

Drop in a script or a voice memo — short clips, long-form, podcasts. Get a clear report on where people leave, why, and a new version that keeps them watching.

Closed beta — request access after sign-up. No card.

Cancel anytime in 1 clickEU-hosted · GDPR-compliantNo credit card to startFree tier included
Your input

Creators who post every day but stay stuck at the same follower count, consistency without a clear point of view trains the algorithm to ignore you, your follower count isn't stuck because you're not consistent enough.

Context

  • Topic: Daily posting without a distinct POV is what trains the algorithm to suppress you
  • Format: TikTok / Reels / Shorts — 60s
  • Hook type: Viewer Failure Attack — attacks the behavior the viewer is most proud of (daily posting) and reframes it as the exact cause of their stagnation

Hook candidates:

  1. 1Posting every day with nothing to say is teaching the algorithm to ignore you.
  2. 2Your follower count isn't stuck because you post too little — it's stuck because you say nothing worth following.
  3. 3The creator posting three times a week with a sharp point of view is growing faster than you right now.

Selected: Posting every day with nothing to say is teaching the algorithm to ignore you. — “Every day” is the viewer's proof of effort, so naming it as the mechanism of suppression creates immediate identity dissonance. Lands in 3 words on the viewer's behavior before the consequence arrives.

Strategy note

The viewer has collapsed consistency with strategy — they believe volume earns growth, so they keep producing without diagnosing why nothing moves. The real failure is undifferentiated content: the algorithm reads low completion rates and weak shares as a signal to stop distributing, not a reason to push harder. The fix is not less posting — it's a POV sharp enough that the right viewer finishes every video. Hook score: 4/10— Names the problem but opens with “your follower count isn't stuck” which delays the identity threat past word 4 and softens the accusation. No mechanism named, no consequence landed.

Script

(Script: ~139 words; target: ~120 words — meta excluded.)

~0s

Posting every day with nothing to say is teaching the algorithm to ignore you. The algorithm does not reward effort. It rewards completion — people watching your video all the way through and sharing it because it said something only you could say. If your content could have been made by anyone, it gets treated like it was made by no one.

~20s

A point of view is not an opinion. It is a specific, repeatable lens that makes a viewer feel like you made the video for them. When that lens is missing, people scroll out at three seconds, completion tanks, and the algorithm buries the next video before it even gets a chance.

~48s · CTA

Write one sentence that only you could say about your niche. Post that. Watch how differently the first three seconds perform against everything you've uploaded before.

Opening frame

  • Shot: Medium close-up, eye-level, direct to camera
  • Expression / action: Flat and certain on the hook — no smile, no nod — let “ignore you” land in silence before the next sentence starts
  • On-screen text: POSTING DAILY IS HURTING YOU
  • Viral logic: The text contradicts the most repeated advice in creator culture — a viewer mid-scroll who posts daily will stop to defend themselves or confirm their fear

Hook variants

  • Variant A: Your follower count isn't stuck because you post too little — it's stuck because you say nothing worth following.
  • Variant B: The creator posting three times a week with a sharp point of view is growing faster than you right now.

Edit notes

  1. 1“It gets treated like it was made by no one” — this is the sharpest line in the script; never cut it for time. If the script runs long in delivery, trim “people watching your video all the way through and” down to “It rewards completion — viewers finishing and sharing because it said something only you could say.”
  2. 2The CTA names a specific observable consequence (“how differently the first three seconds perform”) — do not soften to “see what happens” or “give it a try.” The specificity is what makes it actionable rather than passive.

Quality checklist

  • First 1–3 words trigger identity threat — zero setup language
  • Failure state established within the first 5 seconds
  • Zero rhetorical yes/no questions anywhere
  • Zero banned ad terms or AI filler
  • Close = one action with a named observable consequence

Suggested next prompts

Rewrite the hook as a specific wound — name the exact moment a creator posts their 90th video and finds the same 200 views they had on day oneWrite a 3-minute version adding a second point on how to find your POV using the one question your audience keeps asking youRewrite the CTA as a direct challenge — name the one-sentence test and what it reveals about whether a POV actually exists yet
~139 words · ~60s script

Built for retention

What the app actually does.

No templates, no generic tips. Drop your script, get back a clear report that shows where viewers leave and a fixed version you can record right away.

Same clear report, every time

Strategy, retention risk, script, notes, checklist. Every audit has the same layout, so you always know where to look.

Hook score out of 10

One honest number. One line explaining what works or why it fails.

0/10Hook

Right rhythm per platform

TikTok, YouTube, podcasts. The pacing matches the platform, with no setup.

TikTok / Reelsevery 8–12s
YouTube longevery 2.5–3 min
Podcast / Audioevery 4–6 min
LinkedIn30% · 70%

Word count for the spoken part only

60s is about 120 words. 5 min is about 600. Word targets apply to your script, not to the notes around it.

60s
~120
5 min
~600
10 min
~1200

Edit anything with one message

Say "shorter", "more energy", or "new ending". The app updates your last script. No starting over.

Voice to text, on Pro

Record live or upload a clip. The app writes it out, so you stay in one place.

No fake stats, no lazy outros

The app will not invent numbers, legal facts or medical facts, and it will not promise you views. No "hit subscribe" filler either.

vs ChatGPT

Why not just use ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is a great general assistant. Audyx does one thing: it shows you where viewers leave your video and rewrites your script to keep them watching. Here's the difference in practice.

Capability
ChatGPT
Platform pacing
You figure it out
TikTok, Reels, Shorts, YouTube, Podcast — each platform has the right rhythm built in
Where viewers drop off
No diagnosis
Shows you exactly where viewers leave and why — before you record
Hook options
One generic suggestion
3 hook options per script, each explained so you know which one to use
What you get back
A block of text
Script + hook options + edit notes + quality checklist — same clear layout every time
Sounds like AI
No filter
30+ filler phrases blocked — no "delve into", no "let's explore", no cringe outros
Script length
Often way off target
Always hits your target length — in any language
Voice to script
Chat reply from voice
Upload a clip or record live → full script with hooks and timing in one shot

Questions

Straight answers.

Why is access invite-only?+
We're hand-picking creators during the beta so we can give every tester real attention. Once we're public, the application step goes away.
Is the beta free?+
Yes. Approved beta testers get full Pro-level access at no cost — full retention reports, hook variants, voice to text, the works. No credit card required.
How long does approval take?+
Average response time is 6 hours. We aim to get every approved tester in within 24 hours of applying.
Is this just another template tool?+
No. It reads the script you wrote and tells you what is losing viewers. Then it rewrites it while keeping your voice and your length. You will not get a generic template back.
Will it translate my script into my chat language?+
Only if you ask. The notes follow the language you chat in. The script itself stays in the language you wrote it in.
Will it fake stats or promise views?+
No. It will not invent numbers, legal facts, medical facts, or view-count promises. If something cannot be verified, it is flagged, not faked.
Can I bring a long existing script?+
Yes. Long input always gets an equal or longer rewrite. It will not shrink your script down to a summary.

Private Beta

Audyx is in closed beta.

We're onboarding creators one by one. Apply now — average response in 6 hours, and you'll be in within 24.

Request Beta Access

Newsletter

One short email. Every Friday.

One retention insight, one teardown of a script that worked, and any product update that's actually worth knowing. No filler. Unsubscribe in one click.